[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Re: Chemicals into FW line

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Boilerroom.com Steam-Forum - Number 3 ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Craig on July 07, 2004 at 09:06:59:

In Reply to: Chemicals into FW line posted by Chuck on April 23, 2004 at 17:09:16:

: What problems could one expect, if they used a system that injects chemicals (caustic, phosphate, sludge) into the feed water line that is supplying 3 boilers that operate at 200PSI?

: Most of the time 2 boilers are running, and the third is rotated in and out with the other two, so that at all times, at least to boilers are running. Load varies from 80 - 125Kpph.

: There is much more to this, but I am curious as to what you all think.

: Thanks,

: ~Chuck

Chuck

Another set up that I am used to is puting Sulphite and Amine into the D/A and piping the phosphate to be injected right into the steam drum of each boiler. Of coure this requires high pressure phosphate pumps which have a cost associated with it.

Craig

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:
: : What problems could one expect, if they used a system that injects chemicals (caustic, phosphate, sludge) into the feed water line that is supplying 3 boilers that operate at 200PSI? : : Most of the time 2 boilers are running, and the third is rotated in and out with the other two, so that at all times, at least to boilers are running. Load varies from 80 - 125Kpph. : : There is much more to this, but I am curious as to what you all think. : : Thanks, : : ~Chuck : : Chuck : Another set up that I am used to is puting Sulphite and Amine into the D/A and piping the phosphate to be injected right into the steam drum of each boiler. Of coure this requires high pressure phosphate pumps which have a cost associated with it. : Craig

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Boilerroom.com Steam-Forum - Number 3 ] [ FAQ ]